From the Hill to the NICU
Monthly Advocacy Updates
NANN's Health Policy and Advocacy Committee (HPAC) is committed to advocating for optimized care, and health outcomes for neonates and their families. In an effort to raise awareness of key regulations and issues that affect NANN, NANNP, and the populations we serve, the HPAC Committee will be sending out monthly updates to help keep you informed.
July 2021 - Advancing FASD Research, Services, and Prevention
Raymond Riley, BSN RNC-NIC C-NPT
Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is an often misunderstood and under-diagnosed disorder. When a fetus is exposed to alcohol, a known teratogen, a lifetime of harm can be brought upon the infant and affect the individual as they develop through life. Fetal alcohol syndrome is characterized by dysmorphic facial features, abnormalities in brain structure, neurological deficits, and sensory and neuropsychological abnormalities (Wozniak et al., 2019). In the case of FASD, the facial features may not be present. However, a person with FASD can still suffer from many of the same neuropsychological issues as the individual with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS).
A correct diagnosis poses a challenge due to a lack of accurate reporting of maternal alcohol use, specific biomarkers for testing, and the wide variety of physical symptoms that may or may not present. There is a high prevalence of FASD worldwide due to the widespread use of alcohol, including during pregnancy. It is vital that alcohol use during pregnancy be identified early to allow for early intervention, proper diagnosis, and better outcomes for the exposed infant (Wozniak et al., 2019). Less severe cases of FASD are even more difficult to diagnose and often slip through the cracks. The reluctance to admit alcohol use in pregnancy plays a large role in this issue as well (American Bar Association, 2018). There is currently important work being done in the U.S. Congress to address this disparity in identification, research, and intervention.
The FASD Respect Act (H.R. 4151 & S. 2238), a bipartisan effort, has already been introduced to Congress. It is co-sponsored by Representative Betty McCollum (D-MN) and Representative Don Young (R-AK) and Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) in the House and Senate respectively. This legislation allocates $118 million to screenings, research, identification, and more informed services at the local, state, and federal level in addition to the private sector. Even more importantly, this bill establishes a clearer and stronger societal commitment to advancing research and ensuring that persons with FASD and their caregivers have access to essential services. This bill will also replace defunct and outdated organizations with a National Advisory Council on FASD and establish a Center for Excellence focused on FASD to be the go-to entity when developing or improving best practices for FASD prevention, diagnosis, and intervention (National Organization on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, 2021). Adults with FASD can exhibit behavioral and psychological disturbances leading to more socioeconomic problems for these individuals and their caregivers (Wozniak et al., 2019). The American Bar Association (ABA) has acknowledged this and addressed it through resolutions to protect these individuals.
The resolution passed by the ABA urges attorneys and judges at all levels to be aware of FASD and respond effectively to juveniles and adults in the criminal justice system. Rather than overlooking how FASD can be a contributing factor, this resolution stresses the value of collaborating with medical, mental health, and disability experts to properly address the needs of these individuals. As a whole, this initiative strives to improve the civil, juvenile, and criminal legal representation for individuals with FASD (American Bar Association, 2018).
As NICU nurses, we are also on the front line of identifying potential cases of FASD. We should strive to provide these infants with all the resources that they and their caregivers will need to encourage the best possible outcome in the long term. The FASD Respect Act goes hand in hand with this mission to optimize our ability as healthcare workers to identify and treat.
As we approach FASD Awareness Month (September) and this important legislation moves through Congress, it is imperative that NICU nurses advocate for the FASD Respect Act on behalf of our patients and their families. Reach out to your local representatives and senators to ask for their support. To identify your representatives and senators, visit www.usa.gov/elected-officials.
American Bar Association. (2018). FASD Resolution. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_interest/child_law/resources/attorneys/fasd-resolution/.
National Organization on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. (2021). The FASD Respect Act. NOFAS Policy And Training Center. https://nofaspolicycenter.org/the-fasd-respect-act/.
Wozniak, J.R. Riley, E. P. Charness, M.E. (2019). Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder. Lancet Neurol., 18 (8) (2019), pp. 760-770, 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30150-4.
June 2021 - Momnibus Act Seeks to Improve Maternal Health Outcomes, Reduce Disparities
Julie Sundermeier, DNP APRN-NP NNP-BC
The United States has the highest maternal mortality rate of any high-resource country, and the rate continues to rise. 700 women die in the U.S. every year due to pregnancy or delivery complications, and women of color have even higher mortality rates. Black women are three to four times more likely to die from a pregnancy-related cause than White women, and Native American and Alaskan Native mothers have a 2.5-fold risk. (Petersen et al., 2019). This disparity can be attributed to factors such as variations in healthcare, underlying chronic conditions, structural racism, and implicit bias.
The Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act of 2021 (H.R. 959) was introduced on February 28, 2021, to help end preventable maternal mortality and morbidity for all women, and to reduce disparities in maternal health outcomes. The Momnibus Act is composed of 12 individual bills that were each sponsored by a member of the House Black Maternal Health Caucus to build on existing legislation to address the maternal health crisis for all women, especially those of color. Also addressed are actions to mitigate adverse maternal health outcomes associated with climate change and to improve maternal vaccination rates.
The Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act will:
- Address social determinants of health with a focus on areas with high rates of maternal mortality and severe morbidity with disparate outcomes.
- Award grants to community-based organizations to improve maternal health outcomes for underserved populations. Provide training in racial bias and discrimination to healthcare providers in maternity settings.
- Implement a maternity care coordination program for veterans with community maternity care providers that have training and support concerning the unique needs of pregnant and postpartum veterans, particularly regarding service-related mental and behavioral health conditions.
- Improve diversity in the perinatal workforce to allow for culturally congruent maternity care for mothers of color.
- Improve data collection processes and quality measures to better understand the causes of the maternal health crisis in the United States.
- Develop support systems for mothers with maternal mental health conditions and substance use disorders.
- Improve maternal health care and support for incarcerated moms.
- Invest in digital tools like telehealth to improve maternal health outcomes in underserved areas.
- Establish the Perinatal Care Alternative Payment Model Demonstration Project to allow states to test payment models for maternity care, including postpartum care, under Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
- Provide education and guidance for maternity care with COVID-19 and in future public health emergencies.
- Address health risks associated with climate change and environmental toxins, especially for members of racial and ethnic minority groups, pregnant or postpartum individuals, and children younger than age three.
- Raise awareness and increase rates of maternal vaccinations, especially in areas with high rates of unvaccinated individuals.
To change the racial inequalities in maternal-child health outcomes there needs to be action on a public policy level. The Momnibus Act has been endorsed by over 240 organizations. There are several ways to get involved:
- Spread the word on social media sites.
- Engage with local community leaders and stakeholders to garner support.
- Contact your representative in the House or Senate to tell them the importance of this issue.
- Advocate for awareness and support for the Momnibus Act through your professional organizations.
- Staying informed about Momnibus updates by following the U.S. House of Representatives Black Maternal Health Caucus on Twitter or their website.
About the Caucus: Momnibus. US House of Representatives Black Maternal Health Caucus. (2020, February 3). https://blackmaternalhealthcaucus-underwood.house.gov/about.
Petersen, E. E., Davis, N. L., Goodman, D., Cox, S., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Shapiro-Mendoza, C., Callaghan, W. M., & Barfield, W. (2019). Racial/Ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths- United States, 2007-2016. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(35);762–765. DOI: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6835a3.htm?s_cid=mm6835a3_w
May 2021 - Title VIII: What Does It Mean to Us as Nurses?
Michelle Cherry, DNP RN
This year, I was fortunate to represent NANN at the “Nurse in Washington Internship” (NIWI), offered through the Nursing Organizations Alliance (NOA). This program is designed to teach nurses how to advocate for themselves, their profession, and their patients, using our collective voices to improve and further the nursing profession, and healthcare. NIWI provides a forum for government and healthcare policy experts to speak to the nursing community about how each of us can utilize our voice to influence change. In addition, the internship sets up meetings to speak to our members of Congress and their healthcare aide in our home states. Even though this year NIWI had to be conducted virtually, we were still able to speak to other nurses within our state in depth about the issues that were most important to them so we could come together with a collective voice when we spoke to our members of Congress. From my state, we had pediatric, OR, obstetric, and geriatric nurses, as well as nursing instructors who came together to discuss topics that each felt required change in order to improve the care and livelihood of our patients.
A topic at this year’s NIWI was Title VIII, the Nursing Workforce Development program. Title VIII dates back to the 1964 Nurse Training Act, under President Lyndon Johnson, which was enacted in response to a significant nursing shortage, with more than 20% of hospital nursing positions vacant. The funds from this program were utilized to support nursing education, particularly to educate nurses who worked in rural or underserved areas. In addition, the funds provided loan forgiveness for clinical nurses and nursing educators in order to increase retention within the field.
Title VIII funds are awarded from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Advanced nursing education grants have helped educate nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, nurse midwives, nurse anesthetists, nurse administrators, and public health nurses in primary care, unserved and rural areas.
For the last 57 years, Title VIII funding has helped supply the nursing workforce with qualified nurses. The Cares Act (H.R. 748-3) was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and included Title VIII nursing workforce funding under part IV of the healthcare provisions of the law. Title VIII would provide $137,837,000 per year from 2021 through 2025. The funding of this program is imperative in order to help address the undersupply of prepared nurses, as well as the looming loss of experienced nurses every year as our baby boomers retire.
According to the American Organization on Nursing Leadership, “in just a few short years there will be a shortage of almost one million nurses in America” (Title VIII Reauthorization, n.d.). More nurses are needed to care for our aging baby-boomers, to provide increased preventative care and to address chronic conditions. Currently, nursing schools are turning away qualified applicants due to lack of faculty, clinical sites, classroom space, clinical instructors, and budget limitations according to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. In 2019 alone, nursing schools were forced to turn away 80,407 qualified applicants to nursing programs (Nursing Shortage, 2020).
As nurses, we need to continue to speak to our United States senators and representatives about the importance of these Title VIII funds. As for now, the spending bill will temporarily help support the needed growth of our nursing workforce.
Key Provisions in the CARES Act for Health Care Providers. The National Law Review. (2020, March 30). https://www.natlawreview.com/article/key-provisions-cares-act-health-care-providers.
Nursing Shortage. American Association of Colleges of Nursing: The Voice of Academic Nursing. (2020, September). https://www.aacnnursing.org/News-Information/Fact-Sheets/Nursing-Shortage.
Stone, A. (2020, April 9). Title VIII Nursing Workforce Funding Included in CARES Act. ONS Voice. https://voice.ons.org/advocacy/title-viii-nursing-workforce-funding-included-in-cares-act.
Text - H.R.748 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): CARES Act. Congress.gov. (2020, March 27). https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/748/text?s=2&r=26&overview=open#content.
Title VIII Reauthorization. American Organization of Nursing Leadership. (n.d.). https://www.aonl.org/advocacy/key-issues/title-viii-reauthorization.
April 2021 - Prenatal Care in a Pandemic
Raymond Riley, BSN RNC-NIC C-NPT
The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread effects on nearly every facet of life in the United States. Many have not realized the profound impact the pandemic has had on antenatal care and the challenges posed for pregnant people and perinatal care teams.
During pregnancy, there is a litany of tests and screenings recommended to ensure a healthy fetus is growing and developing properly and that the pregnant person is also maintaining optimal health. Pre COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that antenatal care models include at least eight contacts to reduce perinatal mortality and ensure a positive pregnancy experience (World Health Organization, 2016). With the multiple surges of COVID-19 cases throughout the country, in-person prenatal appointments have become limited and restricted in nature. Often, the pregnant person has not been permitted to have support persons with them at appointments, meaning ultrasounds can become a solo affair. Other appointments have been pushed online, removing the personal experience from the prenatal care continuum.
When interviewed, Tali Bogler, a family doctor and low-risk obstetrics provider, described the challenges for pregnant people during the pandemic. Dr. Bogler reported that while the number of antenatal appointments has not necessarily decreased, the quality of appointments has in some cases. Pregnant people are saying appointments can feel rushed and less meaningful, especially virtually, as providers strive for efficiency and adjust to the virtual format. Some individuals have even been asked to do their own measurements at home, prompting the question: Are we missing anything (Brewster, 2020)? It is natural for a NICU nurse to wonder if the virtual, less personal antenatal care will lead to more NICU admissions down the road.
A major consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic described by pregnant people is the isolation felt during their few in-person appointments. Ultrasounds, which can't be done virtually, continue to be in-person. Due to the pandemic, ultrasound examinations are being somewhat limited, no longer used electively, and saved for when a risk is present or further diagnostic testing is needed (ACOG, 2021). When appointments are done in person, the change to not allow support persons in the room can increase anxiety when sometimes worrisome diagnostic tests are done and the results are communicated without the support of a loved one at the pregnant patient's side (Brewster, 2020). This change in antenatal care puts more emphasis on the nurses' role of supporting pregnant people and providing family-centered care.
For the time being, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) continues to recommend taking caution to protect both patients and staff against possible COVID-19 exposure during prenatal care appointments. They also recommend we continue to save in-person appointment times for high-risk patients and those requiring additional tests and procedures. At this time, the preterm birth rates in Europe have decreased over the past year; however, in the United States they continue to remain stable (ACOG, 2021).
As NICU nurses, we should try our best to comfort pregnant people as they navigate pregnancy during a pandemic and emphasize the importance of routine antenatal care. Only time will tell if there will be an impact on future NICU admissions.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2021). COVID-19 FAQs for obstetricians-gynecologists, obstetrics. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2020. Available at: https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/physician-faqs/covid-19-faqs-for-ob-gyns-obstetrics. Retrieved April 10, 2021.
Brewster, A. (2020). This is how prenatal care is changing because of coronavirus. Retrieved April 10, 2021, from https://www.todaysparent.com/pregnancy/being-pregnant/prenatal-care-changing-because-of-coronavirus/
World Health Organization. (2016). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization.
March 2021 - Maryland's Maternal Child Health Initiative: Learning From the Journey
Julie E. Williams, DNP CRNP NNP-BC
From 2019 through March 2021, there were 54 laws enacted across the United States related to maternal and infant mortality and morbidity. In July 2019, the Maryland General Assembly joined the fight and created the Task Force on Maryland Maternal and Child Health under Chapter 661 and 662 of the Acts of 2019 (House Bill 520/Senate Bill 406). The Task Force's goal was to study and make recommendations on maternal-child health, care coordination, and the metrics and finances related to the mother, child, and family (Task Force on Maryland Maternal and Child Health, 2020).
In 2020, the Task Force successfully identified and presented nine recommendations. The recommendations focused on facilitating health care collaboration of critical stakeholders, investing in health improvement, addressing health care disparities, and decreasing health care costs for Marylanders. Key components of the proposal included creating additional workgroups to keep the identified health care efforts moving forward and making a third population health goal.
In 2019, 12.3% of Maryland children lived in families with income below the federal poverty level. The heaviest concentration (31%) of impoverished children were in Baltimore City, which was 80% Black and Hispanic (Kids Count Data Center, n.d.). Food and housing insecurities play a role in the stress and health outcomes of mothers and their children. Research has indicated that an individual's health trajectory over the life span is influenced by early health conditions, including maternal health, in utero conditions, and childhood experiences (Halfon, Forrest, Lerner, & Faustman, 2018). These early experiences can lend themselves to long-term health conditions, including hypertension and obesity.
Compared to other industrialized countries, the United States has a higher maternal and infant mortality rate, with each health outcome exhibiting a significant racial/ethnic disparity. From 2013 to 2017, Maryland's maternal mortality rate was 24.8 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. During this time, African Americans experienced a rate of almost four times that of Whites (44.7 vs. 11.3 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births) (Maryland Department of Health, 2019). Identification of the disparities is essential, but laws, interventions, and measures to mitigate these disparities are more critical.
Under the Maryland All-Payer Model, hospitals are incentivized to support population health. To date, the majority of population health efforts have focused on adults. In fact, two of the three state population goals identified (diabetes and opioid/substance use disorder) do not consistently incorporate strategies that target the maternal-child health population, if at all. While the Task Force realized many successes, one significant achievement is the instatement of Maternal and Child Health as the third total population health goal. More specifically, the goal is to reduce the severe maternal morbidity (SMM) rate by 19% by 2026, with a decrease in Black Non-Hispanic SMM rate by 20% and White Non-Hispanic SMM rate by 15%. Interventions will include a focus on improved preconception health, improved postnatal care, and follow-up.
Despite many interventions and the long history of legal efforts to improve maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, the United States continues to be plagued by high SMM rates. The work Maryland has done to date to prioritize the unique needs of Maternal and Child Health can hopefully encourage other states to do the same. As a nurse working directly with this population, it is imperative to determine the SMM rates within your state and to advocate for the needs of mother and baby. Identify what measures are already in place in your state and what steps can be taken to reduce maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. As a nursing community, we can hopefully come together to influence policy and interventions that will have a lasting positive impact on mothers and children in our communities.
Task Force on Maryland Maternal and Child Health. (2020, August 18). Task Force on Maryland Maternal and Child Health Final Progress Report. Retrieved from Chapter 661 and 662 of the Acts of 2019 (House Bill 520.Senate Bill 406): https://hscrc.maryland.gov/Documents/Maternal%20Task%20Force/Chapters%20661%20and%20662%20of%20the%20Acts%20of%202019%20(House%20Bill%20520.Senate%20Bill%20406)%20%E2%80%93%20Final%20Progress%20Report%20of%20TF%20on%20MD%20MCH.pdf
Kids Count Data Center. (n.d.). Child Population by Race/Ethnicity. Retrieved March 22, 2021, from The Annie E Casey Foundation Kids Count Data Center: https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/6949-child-population-by-race-ethnicity?loc=22&loct=3#detailed/3/106/false/1729,37,871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133/4406,3303,3304,2161,3305,3306,3307,3301,2796/14060,14061
Kids Count data center. (n.d.). Children in Poverty | Kids Count Data Center. Retrieved March 22, 2021 from KIDS COUNT data center: A project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation: https://datacenter.kidscount.org/data/tables/4460-children-in-poverty?loc=22&loct=2#detailed/2/any/false/1729,37,871,870,573,869,36,868,867,133/any/10017,10018
Halfon, N; Forrest, CB; Lerner, RM; Faustman, EM. (2018). Handbook of Life Course Health Development. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Maryland Department of Health. (2019). Maryland Maternal Mortality Review. Baltimore: Maryland Department of Health. Retrieved March 22, 2021 from https://phpa.health.maryland.gov/mch/Documents/Health-General%20Article,%20%C2%A713-1207,%20Annotated%20Code%20of%20Maryland%20-%202019%20Annual%20Report%20%E2%80%93%20Maryland%20Maternal%20Mortality%20Review.pdf
February 2021 - From vaccines to masks, where are we now?
Michele A. Sweet, MS RN CCNS
Despite advances in the development of COVID-19 vaccines, January 2021 marked the deadliest month yet of the pandemic in the U.S., with more than 92,000 COVID-related deaths reported. It has become almost a daily routine to look at COVID case numbers and updates from the Department of Health and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The incidence of COVID fluctuates by region, in part due to differing vaccine rollouts and mask mandates. Let's take a look at the information offered on vaccines and masks.
100 million vaccines have been administered in the U.S. as of the time of this writing, with 1.6 million additional shots administered daily. Two vaccines are now being offered – from Pfizer and Moderna – and a third vaccine, from Johnson and Johnson, is pending FDA approval. The route and efficacy differ by the vaccine type: Pfizer's requires two injections 21 days apart and reports 95% efficacy preventing symptomatic COVID. Moderna's requires two injections 28 days apart and reports 94.1% efficacy preventing symptomatic COVID. Johnson and Johnson's requires one injection and reports 66-85% efficacy against moderate-to-severe infections.
Vaccination started in December, with health care professionals taking priority, followed by the elderly and those living in long-term care facilities. Since vaccination started, there have been many conversations surrounding the vaccines themselves, with reports of some vaccine hesitancy and racial gaps in vaccine access. States vary in approach and staging for distribution, along with the efficiency and equity of the process. Despite the variance in vaccine role out, almost daily you see postings of individuals being vaccinated on social media. For many, it appears to be a badge of honor to receive the vaccine. It can represent joy, relief, emotions reflecting the loss of a loved one to COVID, and hope for returning to the classroom or office.
As we pass the milestone mark of one year since the first reported COVID case in the United States and initiation of mask-wearing, 15 states and territories do not have mask mandates, and four states that previously had mask mandates have lifted them. Areas with a mask mandate are seeing an overall decrease in COVID-19 cases, while areas that do not have a mask mandate continue to see increases in cases (Hubbard, 2021).
On February 1st, President Biden ordered the first federal mandate for masks to be worn in all federal buildings. The CDC subsequently issued an order requiring the use of face masks on nearly all forms of public transportation (CDC, 2021 Requirement). Dr. Anthony Fauci has even recommended wearing two masks in public. Double masking is suggested as a disposable or surgical mask underneath a cloth mask. A new study published by the CDC in February found that wearing two masks is more effective at preventing coronavirus transmission than one, and significantly boosts protection against the virus (Ries, 2021).
Even after being vaccinated, we are advised to continue to mask because we could still potentially spread the virus if exposed to the disease. The CDC has stated, "Clinical trials of the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines found that both do a good job preventing symptomatic COVID-19 disease, including severe COVID-19. However, the trials did not measure whether a person who is vaccinated is less likely to spread the virus to someone else" (CDC, 2021 Key things).
For some, the yearlong mask-wearing is leading to mask fatigue, particularly for those of us who wear masks all day at work in addition to outside the professional setting. Knowing that you are not alone when it comes to suffering mask fatigue can help. Many articles and self-help tips are being shared by nursing publications, professional societies, newspapers, and psychiatrists. Some of these articles cover how to have a conversation about wearing masks with suggested scripting i.e. "It would really make me more comfortable if we all kept our masks on when we're in this room." While mask-wearing can sound tedious, it can be fun to wear your favorite sports team, animal, or nursing association on a mask. The Ohio State University College of Nursing's Mask Up/Mood Up campaign (The Ohio State University, 2021) encourages deep abdominal breathing upon placement of a mask on your face, and subsequently practicing kindness to yourself and others, with affirmation and gratitude.
Nurses are one of the most trusted professions out there, and we continue to lead the way during this pandemic. Remain informed about your state's vaccine initiatives and spread the word on mask-wearing. Remember to take care of yourself during the pandemic, stop the spread, and spread the word!
Hubbard, K. (2021, February 12). These states have mask mandates. US News and World Report. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/these-are-the-states-with-mask-mandates
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, February 10). Requirement for face masks on public transportation conveyances and at transportation hubs. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/face-masks-public-transportation.html
Ries, J. (2021, January 25). Why you should double-mask to prevent COVID-19. Huffington Post. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-double-mask-prevent-covid_l_600f3e87c5b600a27962329e
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, February 9). Key things to know about COVID-19 vaccines.
The Ohio State University. (2021, February 4). Mask on/mood up campaign launches to reduce stress and boost mood. Health and Wellness, Chief Wellness Officer.
ANA Enterprise. (2021, February 5). COVID-19 vaccine frequently asked questions.
Carlsen, A and Huang, P. (2021, February 18). How is the COVID-19 vaccination campaign going in your state? NPR.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, December 30). How CDC is making COVID-19 vaccine recommendations
Greenhouse, S. (2020, July 30). The coronavirus pandemic has intensified systemic economic racism against Black Americans. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-pandemic-has-intensified-systemic-economic-racism-against-black-americans
Harvard Health Publishing. (2021, February 18). Coronavirus resource center; as coronavirus continues to spread, many questions and answers. https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/coronavirus-resource-center#:~:text=The%20answer%20is%2C%20we,virus%20to%20someone%20else
Markowitz, A. (2021, February 17). State-by-state guide to face mask requirements. AARP.
The Ohio State University. (2021, February 10). How to talk to coworkers who aren't following safety guidelines. FirstUp. https://onfirstup.com/ohiostate/ohiostate/contents/24298531?tok=8b725d11-f511-40bc-9742-57532bc2cc94_3122438
US Department of Health and Human Services. (2021, February 5). COVID-19 vaccines.
January 2021 - Maternal Access to Mental Health Care: A NICU and National Priority
Susie Taylor, BSN RNC-NIC
Access to mental healthcare for postpartum women must be a priority. One in seven women in the United States will suffer from postpartum depression (PPD) and anxiety disorders. PPD and anxiety can range from mild to severe and can impact not only the mother but the entire family (Feldman, 2020). The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that women receive at least one screening for PPD and anxiety disorders during the perinatal period, usually at their 6-week appointment (ACOG, 2015). Mothers with PPD or anxiety often begin showing signs 1 to 3 weeks after delivery, but symptoms can occur up to one year after childbirth (ACOG, 2015). Mothers with PPD exhibit signs of exhaustion, disengagement with their infant, restlessness, severe anxiety or panic attacks, inability to sleep, or thoughts of harming oneself or baby (mayoclinic.org). Research shows that untreated PPD and anxiety disorders can last longer and have a larger impact on the family unit if not addressed. Children of mothers with untreated PPD are shown to have an increased risk of social emotional disorders, a harder time sleeping, slower weight gain, and delays in language development (mayoclinic.org). Since PPD can impact the entire family and the growth and development of children, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends routine screening of mothers during the 2-week, 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-month routine well child visits (AAP, 2020).
Risk factors for PPD are a history of depression, stressful events during pregnancy, traumatic deliveries, low socioeconomic status, poor access to support systems, and babies who have health problems or special needs (mayoclinic.org). While 10% to 15% of postpartum mothers may experience PPD, it is important to note that studies show this number increases to 20% to 35% with NICU admissions (Lean, Rogers, Paul, Gerstein, 2018). During these heightened times of stress, fear, and often isolation from routine life, parents are at a greater risk for PPD and need for intervention. NICU mothers often experience a sense of loss. They have limited control over the care of their infant which can impact bonding. They are sharing precious time with strangers rather than family. When you couple the stress of a hospitalization, with the knowledge that the prime time to assess and intervene for new mothers is at well child visits that are not occurring due to hospitalization, it is easy to see how the mental health of new mothers in the NICU can be overlooked. In addition, it is important to note that women from minority groups are less likely to seek treatment for PPD disorders and if they do are also less likely to follow up with referral care, leaving them at higher risk for repeated depression (Feldman, 2020).
So how can we, as healthcare providers in the NICU, help? We can look for signs of depression or anxiety in new moms (and dads), normalize PPD and anxiety, and verbalize the importance of seeking treatment for the sake of not only the mom, but the baby as well. It is important to work closely with multidisciplinary teams to ensure the whole family unit is being cared for.
We can also advocate for our patients and their families on the national level. In 2019 and 2020, Congress began work on a number of bills aimed at increasing healthcare access for postpartum mothers and children. As the 117th Congress gets underway, we can advocate for the work started to not be forgotten. Bills such as the Helping MOMS Act (H.R. 4996) would extend Medicaid and CHIP eligibility to one year postpartum, allowing mothers to receive continued treatment beyond their delivery. We can advocate for the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act of 2020 (H.R. 6142) to pass and focus on programs that address the social determinants of health for pregnant and postpartum women. H.R. 6143 (the Moms MATTER Act of 2020) establishes a Maternal Mental and Behavioral Health Task Force to address prenatal and postpartum depression, anxiety, and substance use disorder, with a focus on minority women who are at higher risk for PPD.
Access to mental healthcare for postpartum women must remain a priority in our units and at the national level. Together we can improve mental health access for our patients and families.
Feldman N. Pattani A (2019, November 29). Black Mothers Get Less Treatment for Postpartum Depression. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/11/29/760231688/black-mothers-get-less-treatment-for-their-postpartum-depression
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. (2021, January 26). Postpartum depression. https://www.acog.org/womens-health/faqs/postpartum-depression
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2021, January 26). Perinatal depression. https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/Screening/Pages/Maternal-Depression.aspx
Mayo Clinic. (2021, January 26). Postpartum depression. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/postpartum-depression/symptoms-causes/syc-20376617
Lean, R. E., Rogers, C. E., Paul, R. A., & Gerstein, E. D. (2018). NICU Hospitalization: Long-Term Implications on Parenting and Child Behaviors. Current treatment options in pediatrics, 4(1), 49–69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986282/
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, January 26). Depression among womenhttps://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/depression/index.htm
December 2020 - Nurses in Congress: Providing Nurses a Seat at the Table
Michelle Cherry, RN DNP
Nurses have a unique perspective into the needs, struggles, and hopes of their patients and patients' families. This inimitable insight makes nurses incredibly valuable at any table, including those of the United States Congress. Nurses are encouraged to become politically active in order to optimize care and health outcomes for neonates and their families and to reduce health care disparities. Nurses have historically stepped into leadership roles at the federal level and we are happy to report that this tradition will continue as a result of the recent national elections.
I am proud of the nurses who have stepped forward to ensure that our important perspectives are heard and that our patients are advocated for. When we think of a nurse who has stood out as the pioneer for nurses' representation in the Federal Government, Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson, RN BSN MPA (D-TX-30) comes to mind. Congresswoman Johnson was the first nurse ever elected into Congress in November 1992 and is currently serving her 14th term. She won this year's election with 78% of the votes. Congresswoman Johnson achieved a lot of firsts upon her congressional election, including being the first chief psychiatric nurse of Dallas; first African American elected to the Texas House of Representatives from Dallas; first woman in Texas history to lead a major committee of the Texas House of Representatives; and the first African American appointed regional director of U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (Pollitt, 2020)
Another nurse reelected to office in this cycle is Congresswoman Lauren Underwood (D-IL-14). She was sworn into the 116th U.S. Congress on January 3, 2019. She is the youngest African American woman to serve in the United States House of Representatives. Her motivation to join the congressional race was to protect health care for those specifically with pre-existing conditions. She signed onto the Title VIII nursing reauthorization legislation. Congresswoman Underwood serves on the House Committee on Education and Labor, the House Committee on Veteran's Affairs, and the House Committee on Homeland Security. She also serves on the House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. (About: Lauren Underwood, 2020). She won this year's election with a close 50.7% of the vote.
Congresswoman Karen Bass (D-CA-37) began her political career representing the 47th district in the California State Assembly (2004–2010). Bass started her professional career as a licensed vocational nurse before becoming a physician assistant (PA), and she was the first PA ever elected to Congress. She was elected to serve as the 67th Speaker of the California State Assembly in 2008 and became the first African American woman in U.S. history to serve as a Speaker of a state legislative body. She was the U.S. Representative for the 33rd congressional district from 2011 to 2013. She currently serves California's 37th congressional district and has served her district since 2013. She won this year's election with 85.9% of the vote. She is chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, Chair of the United States House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations, and United States House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.
Other notable nurses who have helped pave the way for nursing representation in Congress are Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA) who served from 1998 to 2017, and Rep. Peggy Wilson (R-AK) who served on North Carolina's House of Representatives 25th district from 1989 to 1993. In 2001, Wilson was elected to Alaska's 2nd District House of Representatives and served from 2001 to 2013 and the 33rd district from 2013 to 2015. Rep. Elizabeth Dennigan (D-RI) served her district from 1996 to 2009 and is not only a nurse but a lawyer as well.
As nurses, we took an oath to advocate for our patients, and what better way to achieve that than by seeking elective offices. These opportunities would provide the most impact on giving others a glimpse into the daily challenges nurses struggle to overcome when caring for their patients as well as the challenges our patients face in navigating the health care system.
About: Lauren Underwood. (2020, January 28). Retrieved December 07, 2020, from https://underwood.house.gov/about
Clavreul, G. (n.d.). Vote For A Nurse! Retrieved November 03, 2020, from https://www.workingnurse.com/articles/Vote-For-A-Nurse
Nurses Serving in Congress. (n.d.). Retrieved November 03, 2020, from https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/federal/nurses-serving-in-congress/
Pollitt, P. (2020, February 01). Nurses in Congress: Eddie Bernice Johnson. Retrieved November 03, 2020, from https://minoritynurse.com/nurses-in-congress-eddie-bernice-johnson/
September 2020 - Make Plans to Cast Your Vote
Michele A Sweet, MS RN CCNS-Neo
Where will you be on Election Day, November 3rd, 2020? None of us can be sure, but we encourage all NANN members to take a little time now to explore the candidates and the issues and to make plans to cast your vote in November.
The United States has a participatory democracy and representative government. Voting is not only a right but a responsibility. The ultimate job review you can give your public officials is by voting – either returning them to office or ending their service. Every vote matters when advocating for the healthcare policies needed to support our profession, our neonates, and their families. Effective advocacy begins with an understanding of the core issues and positions influencing nursing practice at the state and federal level. Not sure where candidates stand on certain issues? Not sure where you are going to be on Election Day? Check out your state legislature's website, the American Nurses Association election information site – www.nursesvote.org, The March of Dimes' advocacy page, and various social media sites that make educating yourself about healthcare policy and candidates easy. Also, take time to learn about casting an absentee ballot in your state, so that no matter where you are on Election Day your voice will be heard.
Nurses are 4 million strong across the U.S. and are the heartbeat and pulse of many communities. By some estimates, 1 out of every 45 potential voters is a nurse. Nurses are advocates for themselves, their own families, their communities, and the neonatal population and families they serve. With the 100th anniversary of the passing of the 19th Amendment (ensuring women the right to vote), we are reminded of the work undertaken by our ancestors, and the nurses before us, who helped make voting an equal right for all. Nursing leaders of the past – Florence Nightingale, Clara Barton, and Dorothea Dix – established a historical foundation that continues to impact nurses today. Nurses in Congress today (Eddie Bernice Johnson [D-TX] and Lauren Underwood [D-IL]) and in the past like Lois Capps who established the Nursing Caucus, have been involved in important discussions involving Medicare, mental health care, opioid safety, safe staffing, and nursing workforce issues to name a few.
Want to learn more about how you can increase your influence on these important issues? Check out the resources on NANN's advocacy page.
The year 2020 has involved ultimate challenges in healthcare. Nurses can help make an impact on the health care that influences their patients and families by either casting an absentee ballot and/or making arrangements to vote early or on Election Day. No matter how you decide to vote, let your voice be heard! Many state deadlines to register to vote or request an absentee ballot are approaching. Check if you are registered so you can be part of the November election.
August 2020 - Advocating for the Rights of Breastfeeding Mothers
Michelle Cherry, RN DNP
With the month of August coming to a close, it felt fitting to reflect on policy and advocacy endeavors surrounding breastfeeding, since August is Breastfeeding Awareness Month. The purpose of Breastfeeding Awareness Month is to promote breastfeeding and raise awareness of the importance of breastmilk/breastfeeding. Feeding breastmilk to infants has an impact on both long- and short-term health outcomes for the infant. Breastfed babies have been shown to have lower incidence of otitis media, urinary tract infections, episodes of diarrhea, and a lower risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) (Belay, Allen, Williams, Dooyema, & Foltz, 2013). In addition, breastfed infants have lower medical costs due to needing fewer provider visits, hospitalizations, and prescriptions. Breastfeeding also provides benefits to the mother such as, return to pre-pregnancy weight and a reduced risk of breast cancer and osteoporosis. Early and exclusive breastfeeding positively impacts childhood survival in terms of brain development, cognitive performance, and educational achievement seen at age 5 (UNICEF: Breastfeeding, 2015). Breastmilk is the most complete form of nutrition for infants, therefore, interventions that improve breastfeeding rates need to be explored and implemented in order to improve the overall health of our population ("Maternal, Infant, and Child Health," 2016).
One of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Section 4207, amends the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 which requires employers to provide each employee reasonable time to express her milk for her child through the age of one. The employer is not required to pay the employee for this time, but the time must be made available. In addition, employers with more than 50 employees are required to provide a place for employees to express breast milk (other than a bathroom). The ACA also requires new private health insurance plans to cover some women's preventative services such as breastfeeding support, supplies, and lactation counseling.
In July 2019, Congress passed the Fairness for Breastfeeding Mothers Act which requires certain public health buildings to provide a clean space, other than a bathroom, which contains a chair, an electrical outlet, and a workable surface for the public to express milk.
When it comes to supporting breastfeeding on a state level, there are areas of the country that excel and areas where we still have opportunities for growth.
Where we excel:
- Women can breastfeed in any public or private location in all 50 states, including the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
Where our opportunities lie:
- Public indecency laws that exempt breastfeeding exist in only 32 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
- Laws that relate to breastfeeding in the workplace exist only in 32 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
- Breastfeeding mothers are exempt from jury duty (or their time may be postponed) in only 19 states and Puerto Rico.
- Breastfeeding awareness educational campaigns have been implemented in only 6 states and Puerto Rico.
Where does your state stand on these issues? Write your congressman and advocate for better amenities for our mothers to ensure their long-term success and improve health outcomes for both mom and baby.
Belay, B., Allen, J., Williams, N., Dooyema, C., & Foltz, J. (2013). Promoting Women's Health in Hospitals: A Focus on Breastfeeding and Lactation Support for Employees and Patients. Journal of Women's Health, 22, 1-4. doi:10.1089/jwh.2012.4040
Maternal, Infant, and Child Health: Objectives. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health/objectives
Maternal, Infant, and Child Health: Overview. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health
Tahra Johnson, K. B. (2020, July 9). Breastfeeding State Laws. Retrieved August 23, 2020, from https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/breastfeeding-state-laws.aspx
UNICEF: Breastfeeding. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_24824.html
July 2020 - COVID-19 Bias and Anti-Racism Training Act
Susie Taylor, BSN RNC-NIC
The COVID-19 pandemic has been wreaking havoc for four months, and the call for racial justice in the nine weeks since George Floyd's death has brought our country to the precipice of life-altering change. As members of the sacred nursing profession, we are called to encourage, influence, and be the change needed. NANN has already started this process for change by sharing the message from American Nurses Association president, Ernest J. Grant, PhD RN, and his charge to not only educate yourself but to also "use your trusted voice" to drive change.
Now, we nurses have another opportunity to support positive change, thanks to Representative Alma S. Adams and Senator Kamala Harris' COVID-19 Bias and Anti-Racism Training Act. This legislation aims to directly improve the care that people of color receive through targeted education of health care providers about how to check their own bias and dismantle the systemic racism within our health care structure.
The bill would create a $200 million grant program that would assist with the improvement or establishment of bias and anti-racism training for hospitals, health care providers, medical and professional schools, as well as state and local public health departments. The bill prioritizes funding for the areas of the country that have been hit hardest with the pandemic and are demonstrating high racial and ethnic disparities related to infections, treatment, hospitalizations, and mortality. In addition, the bill requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to collaborate with health care professionals along with bias and racism policy experts. Together, they would partner with community-based organizations to create evidenced-based training and ongoing education related to bias and anti-racism in health care.
The CDC recognizes that severe illness and death rates tend to be higher for "racial and ethnic minority populations during public health emergencies." COVID-19 is no different, as non-Hispanic Black persons are five times more likely to contract COVID-19, be hospitalized, or die from the disease than non-Hispanic white persons. Hispanic or Latino persons are four times more likely to experience these impacts than non-Hispanic white persons.
Through the support of the COVID-19 Bias and Anti-Racism Training Act and both informal and formal training, nurses across the United States could receive further education on how to acknowledge their own implicit biases and the health care inequities that exist in the United States, and work to eliminate systemic racism. As a nursing organization we stand with the bill sponsors, and health care organizations across the country, to support this bill and advocate for the education to better serve our patients.
In addition to contacting your senator or representative and asking for their support for the passage of the COVID-19 Bias and Anti-Racism Training Act, take time to act now. Educate yourself on the history of systemic racism in the United States and work to immediately improve the care you give daily by educating yourself on your own bias. Resources include:
- COVID-19 Bias and Anti-Racism Training Act of 2020
- NANN's Position Statement on Racial Disparity in the NICU
- Harman, Katharine et al. "Ethnicity and COVID-19 in children with comorbidities." The Lancet. Child & adolescent health vol. 4,7 (2020): e24-e25. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30167-X
- Kirby, Tony. "Evidence mounts on the disproportionate effect of COVID-19 on ethnic minorities." The Lancet. Respiratory medicine vol. 8,6 (2020): 547-548. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30228-9
- Evaluate your own bias at https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/takeatest.html
June 2020 - Lend Your Voice to Advance Equitable Healthcare
Tommie Farrell, RN
Julie Sundermeier, DNP APRN NNP-BC
According to NANN's 2020 Advocacy Agenda, our organization pledged to support and enhance legislation that would benefit all babies regardless of race, parental economic/educational status, or geographic area. When adding disparities in the NICU to the Advocacy Agenda, no one could have predicted the COVID-19 pandemic or the societal unrest that would follow the death of George Floyd. Both events have highlighted our nation's profound inequalities and the challenges we face in order to create a more equitable world. As nurses, we must hold ourselves, our hospitals, and our governments accountable to the work that needs to be done in order to dismantle the disparities in our NICUs and healthcare systems.
Nurses have the responsibility to look at the healthcare systems we work in and take thoughtful actions to address inequities and advocate for change. A tangible step nurses can take to address the systemic issues we see in our institutions is to engage with elected officials. For 18 consecutive years, Gallup polls have rated nursing as the most trusted profession in the United States. Now is the time to leverage our trusted position, and to lend our voice, expertise, and compassion to educate and bring about the necessary changes to create a more equitable healthcare system.
In a statement to the House Ways and Means Committee on June 1st, President of the American Nurses Association, Ernest J. Grant, PhD RN, called on nurses to "educate yourself and then use your trusted voice and influence to educate others about the systemic injustices that have caused the riots and protests being covered in the news."
"The pursuit of justice requires us all to listen and engage in dialogue with others," he said. "Leaders must come together at the local, state, and national level and commit to sustainable efforts to address racism and discrimination, police brutality, and basic human rights. We must hold ourselves and our leaders accountable to committing to reforms and action."
NANN is aligned with ANA's statement. Our organization understands that nurses can and should lead the charge to create a more just world. Nurses have allies and supporters in Congress, and we must urge them to act too. The Congressional Nursing Caucus is charged with the responsibility of educating elected officials on issues that are important to our profession and how it impacts healthcare. We urge you to review the list of current Caucus Members. If your Representative is not listed, consider sending them a letter urging them to join. This is a great place to start: https://www.aonl.org/advocacy/resources/congressional-nursing-caucus
NANN continues to watch for legislation that will ensure equitable outcomes:
- H.R.1897 MOMMA's Act
- S.116-MOM's Act
- S2373-Rural Maternal and Obstetric Modernization Services Act
We know that there will be more legislation introduced in the weeks and months to come. As a profession, we must reflect on how we can be part of the change in ending systemic racism in our units, hospital systems, and beyond. Change can sound daunting, but a great place to start is in your unit. Read NANN's new position statement, Racial Disparity in the NICU, to learn how you can better support patients and families that face inequality in the NICU. Together we will be able to make great change.
June 2020 - Testing Infants for COVID-19
Raymond K. Riley, BSN RNC-NIC
Health Policy & Advocacy Committee Member
While the COVID-19 pandemic has more significantly affected the adult patient population, especially those with underlying conditions, it is important to take note of the effect the virus has had on the mother/baby dyad. Visiting guidelines have been restricted, mothers and their babies have been isolated from one another, and the continuum of care and childbirth has been interrupted.
There is still a lot to be understood when it comes to infants testing positive for COVID-19 and what protocols should follow. This article does not aim to suggest national guidelines for infants and mothers testing positive for COVID-19, but merely provides examples of what has been done in some NICUs to date, specifically in the region of Washington, D.C., to help nurses navigate the current situation. As NICU nurses, it is our job to stay informed of the most recent guidelines on caring for patients with COVID-19, persons under investigation (PUIs), and their newborn infants. Advocating for patients and their families is more important than ever.
The District of Columbia Department of Health is currently operating under guidelines specified by the CDC. If a pregnant mother tests positive for COVID-19 or gives birth before testing is done and is considered a PUI, then the newborn should also be considered a PUI according to CDC guidelines (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2020). Infants that are considered PUIs (i.e. born to a mother that is positive or a PUI) will need to be tested to rule out COVID-19 infection (Government of the District of Columbia, 2020). Currently, there is little data available on all the possible routes COVID-19 can be transmitted between a mother and a newborn. The CDC is currently recommending that infants should be separated from a mother that is positive or a PUI to minimize the risk of transmission through respiratory secretions. These infants should also be treated as PUIs until they have negative tests (CDC, 2020).
The process for testing an infant is slightly different than an adult. First, the infant should be bathed after birth to remove any fluids potentially containing the virus from the skin. Infants should be tested at 24 hours of life, and then again at 48 hours of life. To test an infant, one swab is inserted into the throat and then into the nasopharynx. That single swab is placed in the viral transport media and sent to the lab for testing (Cummings et al., 2020). An infant would be considered negative if both tests resulted in undetected for the virus.
In the example of Washington, D.C., on a case by case basis, the government health organization directs facilities to allow infants that are born well and test negative to be kept with their COVID-19 positive mother depending on the mother's wishes, facility constraints, illness severity, and individual needs (Government of the District of Columbia, 2020). The CDC endorses this practice and recommends that any infant that is kept in the same room as a positive mother be behind a physical barrier such as a curtain and maintain a 6-foot distance (CDC, 2020). Infants that test negative, do not require NICU admission, and have a negative adult family member can be discharged home. The infant should remain isolated from any positive family members until they are negative. Finally, infants that test positive or remain PUIs, but have no symptoms and do not require NICU care can be discharged home in some cases. These infants should have thorough follow-up through 14 days after birth, and the caretakers should be instructed to take proper precautions at home including hand hygiene, gloves, and masks (Cummings et al., 2020).
Advocating for patients, families, and keeping the mother/infant dyad together, NANN has released a position statement to guide nurses and institutions during the current COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the previously stated CDC guidelines, NANN encourages and fully supports the practice of shared decision making between the mother and the clinical team. This allows the mother to be involved with the decision regarding the plan of care for her infant and develops a working partnership between the two parties. As nurses, we have the opportunity to participate in this holistic approach, determining the plan of care, ensuring that: the family's needs, the infants' needs, and the family's thoughts and feelings are all acknowledged and addressed.
The challenge nurses currently face is immense. To help patients and their families, nurses must try their best to understand the varying and evolving guidelines, recommendations, and the impact protocol may have on a baby and their mother. Together we can learn the best tools for advocating for our mothers and babies during this pandemic.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings.https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html.
Cummings, J., Hudak, M., Kimberlin, D., & Puopolo, K. (2020). Management of Infants Born to Mothers with COVID-19. American Academy of Pediatrics.
Government of the District of Columbia. (2020). Guidance for Pregnant Women COVID19. https://coronavirus.dc.gov/.
National Perinatal Association/ National Association of Neonatal Nurses. (2020). Mothers with COVID-19 and Their Newborn Infants. http://nann.org/uploads/About/PositionPDFS/Position%20Statement%20COVID-19_NPA%20and%20NANN.pdf
April 2020 - Nurses on the Frontline
Julie Sundermeier, DNP APRN NNP-BC
NANNP Council Member
On March 11th, the World Health Organization designated COVID-19 as a global pandemic. In the US, we witnessed the global effects of this virus and continue to experience the impact on society, the economy, and healthcare. Since the first case of COVID-19 was reported in the US on January 11, 2020, the country has reported 938,154 cases, and 53,755 deaths. (John Hopkins University; April 28, 2020). Hospitals across the US, especially in areas hardest hit, have experienced marked shortages of personal protective equipment, testing, ventilators, bed space, and healthcare personnel, including nurses and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs).
To overcome nursing shortages many states took steps to authorize emergency licensure to provide the increased coverage needed during surge capacity. This involved temporary licensure for retired, out-of-state, and inactive nurses and nurse practitioners (NPs). States have also temporarily waived part of the requirements or all requirements for collaborative/supervisory/protocol agreements for NP practice.
The need for professional mobility in times of crisis brings to light advantages of compact State Licenses for RNs, as well as APRNs. Currently there are 33 States with eNCL (Nurse Licensure Compact) legislation for RNs. New Jersey enacted partial implementation on 3/24/20 and Indiana has future implementation slated for 7/1/20. Nurses apply for their multistate license in their home State, which allows them to practice with one license, either in person or via telehealth, in both their home state and other states participating in the NLC.
A license compact for APRNs was proposed in 2015 by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). Under the APRN Compact, APRNs could legally provide care to patients across state lines without having to obtain additional licenses. Currently, three states have signed APRN Compact legislation: Idaho, Wyoming, and North Dakota. These states are 3 of the 22 in the nation (plus the District of Columbia) who grant full practice authority. The primary barrier to the APRN Compact moving forward will be individual state legislation and restrictions that are imposed limiting full practice authority. The APRN Compact will be implemented when 10 states have enacted the legislation. In order to be eligible to join the APRN Compact, states must pass the model legislation without any material differences. (NCSBN, 2020).
The benefits of the APRN Compact include:
- Creates a model that allows APRNs to practice freely among member states while still allowing states to retain autonomy and the authority to enforce the state nurse practice act.
- Improves access to licensed APRNs during a disaster or other times of great need for qualified advanced nursing services.
- Benefits military spouses with APRN licenses who often relocate every two years.
- Grants the necessary legal authority to facilitate interstate information sharing and investigations in the event of adverse actions to ensure public protection.
- Eliminates redundant, duplicative regulatory processes and unnecessary fees.
In addition, many states have called for health care volunteers to help respond to the pandemic crisis. American Academy of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) is tracking calls for volunteers and you can find more information about state volunteer opportunities on their website.
The ANA website has a link for volunteer sites for RNs.
Emergency responses to RN and APRN practice and education, as well as state emergency responses, can be found at https://www.ncsbn.org/14508.htm. National Conference of State Legislatures is tracking state actions related to licensed workers as part of the COVID-19 response:
*eNLC states for RNs include: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
March 2020 - Completing the 2020 Census is More Important than Ever
Susie Taylor, RNC-NIC
NANN HPAC Member
The year 2020 has been declared "The Year of the Nurse and the Midwife" by the World Health Organization and it is also the year for the 2020 United States Census. As nurses it's important to know how the census impacts our federal government, but more important for us is to understand how it will effect healthcare.
Let's start with a quick overview of the basics:
- It is mandated by Article 1 Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution that the population of the United States be counted every ten years. It is vital to get an accurate population count as the U.S. Census helps determine how hundreds of billions of federal dollars will be spent and distributed across the country, including funding for schools, police and fire departments, road and infrastructure projects, and health clinics.
- The 2020 census survey runs from March 12- July 31, 2020 and can be completed online, by phone or in person. In December of 2020 the Census Bureau will give its report to the President and Congress. The 2020 census is being monitored closely to evaluate the need for an extension or change in methodology due to COVID19.
- Based on the number of people counted in each state, changes to the makeup of the U.S. House of Representatives may be adjusted in a process known as reapportionment. Some states will gain an extra congressional representative and others will lose a seat to make up the 435 members of the House of Representatives. The count also impacts the number of Electoral votes each state has in presidential elections.
The census impacts healthcare in a variety of ways. While the census occurs every 10 years, the data taken from it influences the delivery and funding for the healthcare of millions of Americans each year. The Census Bureau is also responsible for the American Community Survey (ACS) to collect socio-economic data of the U.S. population on a yearly basis. With this information the data enables:
- Establishment of eligibility and reimbursement rates set for Medicaid, enrollment for Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).
- Medicare Part B reimbursement rates to be set, and an account for the cost of providing care in specific geographical areas.
- Social Determinates of Health. The 2020 Census tracks the population's race, nation of origin, and type of housing. The ACS expands on the census by evaluating income and educational levels on a yearly basis in order to understand where/what resources are needed most. All of these factors are known to be influencers of health.
- Public Health Measures. The CDC and Department of Health and Human Services utilize census results for research, tracking diseases, and potential barriers to federal program access. Without an accurate count of the population, how could the CDC truly know the impact of a disease such as the yearly flu or the current COVID19?
The 2020 Census is open! Go to https://2020census.gov/ to respond today or to learn more.
Leadership Conference Educational Fund, April, 2018, The Census and Healthcare. Center on Poverty and Inequality, Georgetown Law https://censuscounts.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Census-Health-Care-Factsheet.pdf
March 2020 - 2020 Advocacy Agenda
As the association for neonatal nurses and advanced practice neonatal nurses, NANN seeks to optimize care and health outcomes for neonates and their families. In an initiative to be purposeful with our legislative advocacy efforts, the Health Policy and Advocacy Committee has created an advocacy agenda for the year. We will focus our energy, communication channels, and resources towards advancing our core issues at the federal level. The full agenda follows and an electronic copy is available.
Disparities in the NICU
There are numerous studies demonstrating health disparities in pre-term NICU infants. Three contributors to health disparities have been described: increased risk for pre-term birth, lower quality of care, and socioeconomic disadvantages. NICU mothers who experience poor social determinants of health have an increased risk of losing a child before his or her first birthday. NANN strongly believes that all infants, regardless of race, parental economic or educational status, or geographic area should receive equal, quality healthcare.
Paid Family Leave
Paid family leave allows working people to continue to earn all or a portion of their income while they take time away from work to meet family caregiving or personal health needs. This can include time to address a serious medical condition or a significant health event such as pregnancy (medical) and to care for a newborn. Paid leave is a critical tool to invest in the mother and infant needs, supporting healthier pregnancies, better birth outcomes, more successful breastfeeding, and both physical and mental health in the post-partum period.
Nutrition and Breastfeeding
The breastfeeding experience plays an important role in the healthy neurological development of the infant as well as supporting the establishment of the critical relationship between the infant and mother as a dyad. NANN supports the need for access and education to information on breastfeeding, thereby encouraging breastfeeding as the best possible experience for the nutritional and emotional health of infants.
H.R. 5592 – PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act (S. 3170 Companion Bill)
Nursing Workforce Development
The continued development of the nursing workforce is critical to the health of our country. Through research, education, expansion of access to healthcare facilities and providers, and funding directly connected to meeting the nursing profession's pressing needs, NANN advocates for the entire nursing community.
NANN will continue to provide updates and calls to action regarding our 2020 Advocacy Agenda priorities.
February 2020 - The First 1,000 Days
Michelle Cherry, DNP RN
Children and their mothers have struggled with obtaining adequate nutrition throughout the world and many suffer from chronic malnutrition leading to their developmental growth being stunted. Chronic malnutrition has downstream effects on these children and often lead to life-threatening diseases and infections. Obesity is another form of malnutrition that has affected our youth, mainly due to unhealthy diets.
The United States is one of the wealthiest nations in the world yet still suffers from having one of the highest infant and maternal mortality rates. The U.S. statistics are staggering with:
- 1 in 12 babies being born at low birth weight
- 1 in 6 have not had any breastmilk
- 1 in 4 being overweight/obese by the time they turn 5
- 1 in 6 under 6 years old live in households that struggle with healthy food options.
Contributing to high obesity rate, the U.S. has one of the unhealthiest diets which is high in sugar and saturated fats and low in fruits and vegetables. The population most affected by these low nutritional diets are low-income families. These differences in healthy food intake habits widen the gap with already existing disparities.
Where do we go from here to look to improve the outcomes of our new moms and babies? Supporting the mother's nutritional status during pregnancy is key in ensuring her diet can support the needs of her fetus's rapidly growing brain. The mother requires foods that are rich in folic acid, zinc, iron, and iodine, as well as protein and fatty acids to support this growth. Lack of any of these critical nutrients can lead to developmental delays, cognitive deficits, and birth defects.
During the first 1,000 days of a newborn's life, their brain is growing faster than any other period. The nutritional status of the mother and baby are stepping-stones in building baby's cognition and motor skills. Without proper nourishment and nutrition, the baby's ability to reach developmental milestones is hindered, creating irreversible damage to their growing brain. Once the damage is done, it cannot be reversed and is the reason that the first 1,000 days of life are so important. Breastmilk contains the perfect nutrition to support brain growth and provides nutritional support that formula cannot replicate, such as growth factors and hormones. It is no surprise that breastfed babies perform better on intelligence tests and have higher IQ scores. Breastfeeding also provides physical contact that supports the baby's sensory and emotional needs. Rapid brain growth reaches 80% by age 3 and 90% by age 5, and this growth requires foods rich in iron, zinc, and protein. A deficiency in these critical nutrients can impair their learning capacity and their behavior.
1,000 Days is working to turn what the evidence shows as best practices into a reality to improve the lives of these moms and babies. 1,000 Days focus is to:
Increase investment in women's nutrition and health throughout the 1st 1,000 days
Expand programs that provide the most vulnerable children with proper nutrition to ensure they thrive- In December 2019, funding for global nutrition programs was increased by $150 million
Improve baby/toddler diets and feeding practices- Supplemental nutrition programs for WIC will receive $6 billion, and Breastfeeding Peer Counselor Programs will receive full funding of $90 million for the 1st time
Improve policy and funding to ensure that more children are provided with mother's own milk- The CDC received a small increase after years of flat funding to include $9 million aimed at providing hospitals and states with the tools to help improve breastfeeding rates and implement baby-friendly practices.
Calling on Congress and the administration to support a comprehensive paid family and medical leave program that covers all workers
Join the movement to help moms and babies by visiting 1,000 Days website and send a letter to your members of Congress to urge their support in the campaign and for Paid Parental Leave.
Homepage- 1,000 Days. (n.d.). Retrieved January 27, 2020, from https://thousanddays.org/
July 2019 - Update on Nurse Practitioner Full Practice Authority in the U.S.
Julie Sundermeier, DNP APRN NNP-BC
The American Association of Nurse Practitioners defines full practice authority as "the authorization of nurse practitioners (NPs) to evaluate patients, diagnose, order and interpret diagnostic tests and initiate and manage treatments—including prescribe medications—under the exclusive licensure authority of the state board of nursing." There are 22 states and the District of Columbia, along with two U.S. territories, who currently have Full Practice Authority (FPA) for nurse practitioners as seen in green on the map below (AANP, 2018). States with a reduced or restricted environment have laws either requiring a career-long regulated collaborative agreement, limits on the setting of one or more elements of NP practice, or delegation and team management by another health provider.
Several states have introduced FPA legislation in 2019 with varying degrees success including California, Florida, Kansas, Indiana, Massachusetts, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin. As legislation is introduced APRNs are educating legislators and the public on how FPA can improve access to care, reduce cost, and increase efficiency. States are also making incremental advances towards Full Practice Authority. Below are examples of 2019 state legislation regarding prescriptive authority:
- Arkansas - AR H 1267- Enacted March 29. Extends the prescriptive authority of an advanced practice registered nurse to Schedule II drugs, under certain conditions.
- New Jersey - SB 1961 eliminates requirement of joint protocol with physician for advanced practice nurses to prescribe medication.
- Utah - HB 336 signed in to law on March 25. Amends the requirements for NPs to maintain a consultation and referral plan to legally prescribe Schedule II agents. Once enacted, the law narrows this requirement to NPs who open their own practice and who have been licensed as an APRN for less than one year, or who have fewer than 2,000 hours of practice. The new law allows the supervisor of a consultation and referral plan to be either a physician or an APRN who has at least three years of experience. The requirement for a career-long consultation and referral plan for NPs who own or operate pain management clinics remains unchanged.
AANP (2018, December). State Practice Environment. Retrieved from https://www.aanp.org/advocacy/state/state-practice-environment
Alyssa Jelinek, BSN RNC-NIC
Introduced by Representative Kelly (D-IL), the Mothers and Offspring Mortality and Morbidity Awareness (MOMMA) Act overall aims to improve federal efforts in preventing maternal mortality. Within the United States about 700 women die due to pregnancy related complications while another 65,000 suffer near-fatal complications. The United States continues to have a high maternal mortality rate when compared to other countries, it is believed that as many as half of these are preventable. There are also significant racial disparities with Black women dying of maternal-related deaths at three to four times that of non-Hispanic White women; specifically, there are 12.7 death per 100,000 live births for White women, 14.4 deaths per 100,000 live births for women of other ethnicities, and an alarming 43.5 deaths per 100,00 live birth for Black women.
The MOMMA act will address these alarming issues through developing policies to improve data collection, disseminate information on effective interventions, and expand health care and social service access for postpartum women. The MOMMA act would also extend Medicaid, CHIP, and WIC coverage for pregnant and postpartum women from 60 days to 1 year. Finally, this legislation aims to address cultural competency and implicit bias (attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions and decisions in an unconscious manner) through education.
Please support the MOMMA Act by following this link to reach out to your Representative and Senators.
H.R. 728: Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2019
Introduced by Representatives Joyce (R-OH), Gabbard (D-HI), Davis (R-IL), Bonamici (D-OR), Matsui (D-CA), Castor (D-FL), McKinley (R-WV), and Underwood (D-IL) on January 23rd, 2019, the purpose of the bill is to amend Title VIII of the Public Health Service Act, extending through Fiscal Year 2024. Specific programs focus on nurse retention, recruitment, education (through advanced education), and faculty preparation.
The new bill proposes amendments to several sections to include:
- An annual report on the nursing workforce programs to be submitted by the Secretary. The purpose of the report is to assess the Department of Health and Human Services' programs and activities to improve the nursing workforce. The report will identify to what extent the programs are meeting their goals.
- Recognition for all advance practice nursing roles with newest addition of clinical nurse specialists; adding the CNS to the current group of nurse practitioners, certified registered nurse anesthetists and certified nurse-midwives.
- Further funding for increasing nursing workforce diversity, giving grants to increase opportunities for students with minority backgrounds.
- Promote a career ladder through supporting career advancement through rewarding grants to promote specialty training as well as baccalaureate and graduate prepared nursing education, among other supportive measures.
- Adds Nurse Managed Health Clinics to list of eligible entities in the definition section
Theresa Crowe, BSN CCRN
The government has reopened and Congress is back to work. Among the many pieces of legislation that have been introduced for consideration this year, there are a handful that should be of particular interest to health care professionals working with moms and babies.
First, is the Modernizing Obstetric Medicine Standards or "MOMS" Act, introduced by Sen. Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY). This act seeks to provide $5,000,000 a year from 2020-24 to the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) to study, develop, and initiate best practices that would improve the quality and safety of maternity care across the continuum. The end goal would be to decrease the high levels of maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States.
Next, Rep. David P. Joyce (R-OH-14) has introduced H.R. 383, Continuing Coverage for Preexisting Conditions Act of 2019, which, if passed, would maintain the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's particular requirement that people could nNAot be denied insurance coverage because of their pre-existing conditions. This is significant for many of our moms seeking prenatal care who have pre-existing conditions such as diabetes, as well as important to many of our babies who will grow up with chronic illnesses. Another bill that would adversely affect access to prenatal care, especially for low-income women, is H.R. 369 Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2019 as introduced by Representative Vicky Hartzler (R-MO-4).
Finally, there is the Nationally Enhancing the Wellbeing of Babies through Outreach and Research Now or "NEWBORN" Act, introduced by Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN-9). This would provide HRSA with $10,000,000 each year from 2020-24 to target areas in the United States with the highest rates of infant mortality (city or rural). HRSA would then work with local agencies already in place to fund outreach, education, and treatment programs aimed at decreasing the infant mortality rate in these areas. This systems approach includes efforts to prevent preterm labor, enhance maternal health and address family needs, (including mental health, substance abuse, housing, domestic violence, smoking cessation, access to health care, etc.), as well as education and support for parents on how to care for babies and keep them safe and healthy. This program would also require HRSA to track information on the success of the programs utilized so that in 2024, health agencies will have a better idea where to focus their efforts across the entire country to further decrease our high rate of infant mortality.
Advocate on behalf of your profession!
All of the above pieces of legislation have just been introduced in January 2019. If one of your New Year's resolutions is to become more aware of or active in the issues that affect you and your patients, follow their progress on Congress.gov. You can look up any piece of legislation in either the House or Senate and even apply filters to help you get to specific areas of interest or concern (such as health). In addition, you can always email or call your local representatives to express your support or opposition to these bills (many are co-sponsored by other Congressmen and Congresswomen) or the offices of the individuals listed above who have introduced them.
Tommie Farrell, RNC-NIC
HPAC Board Liaison
The U.S. Government has finally reopened after the longest shut down in history - Congress now has until February 15 to make a deal or risk another shutdown. With Nancy Pelosi (D-CA-12) retaking the position of Speaker of the House, the shutdown represented the new power dynamic at the federal level as the Democrats now control the House of Representatives. The incoming freshmen for the House represents the most diverse class ever.
As for health care, we are seeing more science-based representation. Four RN elected officials bring years of nursing and health care education and expertise with them. It is imperative that the most trusted profession in the country has the ability to advocate for our patients and families, present evidence for the need for adequate health care access, and share our unique perspective on how best to reach and care for underserved populations.
Presently, there are four nurses in Congress.
U.S. Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX-30), reelected to a 14th term was the first nurse elected to Congress and has been a tireless advocate for nurses on the Hill. She serves on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, as well as serving on the House Committee on Transportation, and Infrastructure. Johnson is also a part of the Nursing Caucus.
U.S. Rep. Donna Shalala (D-FL-27), Secretary of Health and Human Services under former President Bill Clinton and chair of the 2010 Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing Report at the Institute of Medicine, won a Miami-area congressional seat. Shalala has built a reputation as a staunch supporter of nurses throughout her distinguished career, most recently serving as president of the University of Miami. (Campaign for Action, November, 2018) Shalala serves on the House Committees on Rules and Education and Labor.
U.S. Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-IL-14), is an RN who is the youngest black female to be elected to Congress. Her focus has been on public health policy and she has a strong interest in the Affordable Care Act, focusing on pre-existing conditions. She holds two master's degrees in public health and nursing. Her background includes work with the Obama administration working on public health, emergencies, and disaster response. She has also worked for the Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S Rep. Karen Bass, (D-CA-37), originally a vocational nurse, moved on to become a physician's assistant. She serves on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and is on the House Judiciary Committee.
Advocate on behalf of your profession!
These women represent the future of health care. We encourage you to engage with NANN and your elected officials to help shape what the future will look like for the nursing profession, health care policy and our vulnerable patients.
Stephanie M. Blake, DNP APRN NNP-BC
HPAC continued its reporting on the funding crisis facing the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). CHIP is a grant program in which the federal government and the state's share the cost of extending health insurance coverage to children who neither qualify for Medicaid or whose parents don't have health insurance through their jobs.
Good news for the millions of children covered under this program, CHIP funding has been extended in the federal budget through FY2023. A few highlights of the new funding:
- Provides federal funding for CHIP for six years, from FY2018 through FY2023.
- Continues the 23-percentage point enhanced federal match rate for CHIP that was established by the Affordable Care Act, but reduces the federal match rate to the regular CHIP rate over time.
- Extends the requirement for states to maintain for coverage for children from 2019 through 2023; after October 1, 2019, the requirement is limited to children in families with incomes at or below 300% FPL.
HPAC played a pivotal role in the continued advocacy for this program. Title VIII or the Nursing Workforce Development program funds nursing education helping educate nurses who work in the rural or underserved areas. Additionally, the funds provide loan forgiveness for clinical nurses and nursing educators in order to increase retention within the nursing field. The funds for this program are awarded from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The advanced nursing education grants have helped educate nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, nurse midwives, nurse anesthetists, nurse administrators, and public health nurses in primary care in unserved and rural areas. The Fiscal Year 2018 Omnibus Appropriations bill was signed by the President and includes $249.472 million for Title VIII, which is close to a 9% increase over FY 2017. The bill also included $158 million for the National Institute of Nursing Research, which is a 5% increase over FY 2017.
On June 7th, the Justice Department indicated that it would not defend the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) constitutionality in a case filed by Texas and 19 other states (opposed by 16 other states). The case asserts that because the new Republican tax act removed the individual mandate, the ACA is no longer a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to tax, as established by a 2012 Supreme Court decision. In its statement letter, the Justice Department contends that the ACA provision requiring most Americans to carry health insurance will soon no longer be constitutional and that, as a result, consumer insurance protections under the law will not be valid either – including preexisting conditions coverage. If these provisions of the ACA were to be deemed unconstitutional, it would once again allow insurers to deny or charge more to people with chronic or preexisting conditions.
Theresa Crowe, BSN CCRN
On June 7th, the Justice Department indicated that it would not defend the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) constitutionality in a case filed by Texas and 19 other states (opposed by 16 other states). The case asserts that because the new Republican tax act removed the individual mandate, the ACA is no longer a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to tax, as established by a 2012 Supreme Court decision.
In its statement letter, the Justice Department contends that the ACA provision requiring most Americans to carry health insurance will soon no longer be constitutional and that, as a result, consumer insurance protections under the law will not be valid either – including preexisting conditions coverage. If these provisions of the ACA were to be deemed unconstitutional, it would once again allow insurers to deny or charge more to people with chronic or preexisting conditions.
The removal of such protections may cause new challenges for our patient populations. NANN will continue to monitor and provide up-to-date information as it becomes available.
Tommie Farrell, BSN RNC-NIC
If you ever want to feel energized and empowered, spend a day in DC with almost 1000 nurses and advocate for our patients, health care and our profession! My colleague, Heather Hopkins (DVANN) and I joined the American Nurses Association (ANA) on the Capital Hill on June 21st to elevate nursing concerns and demonstrate how our collective voices matter in directing healthcare in America.
While on the Hill, we were able to shine a light on critical issues impacting healthcare, our patients, and our nursing practice. Among the topics we spoke about were the Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act, (H.R. 959/ S. 1109), The Safe Staffing for Nurse and Patient Safety Act (H.R. 5052/ S. 2446), and The Addiction Treatment Access Improvement Act of 2017 (H.R. 3692/S. 2317). Many of us had other concerns, not the least of which is the status of families and children caught up in the Immigration debate. So, yes, we dove right in to let everyone know that nurses stand behind the need to protect these vulnerable families.
Because of our advocacy on June 21st, we were able to speak to the importance of APRN prescribing authority regarding MAT (medication assisted treatment). The very next day and directly influenced by our stories, this bill passed through the House and is next up in the Senate. This directly impacts our NAS infant's outcomes for them and their mothers. What a great feeling to have participated in this process!
It is easy to be overwhelmed by our daily lives and feel we don't have time or energy to add advocacy to our list of "to do's" but it is critical for nurse's voices to be heard and to be part of the process. We are the front line for healthcare in America. You certainly don't need to get to DC to do this. Call, email, write and participate in local town halls. Stop by your local offices to check in and tell your story. As we continue to stay involved in advocacy, we look forward to you joining is in the process.
April 2018 - Title VIII Nursing Workforce Development: Small Win and What's Next?
Michelle Cherry, DNP RN
Now that President Trump has signed the spending bill to fund the government through September: what is the impact on nursing, what is Title VIII funding, and what does it mean to you?
Title VIII or the Nursing Workforce Development program originally began in 1964 by Lyndon Johnson as the Nursing Training Act of 1964 in response to the nursing shortage – more than 20% of hospital nursing positions were vacant. The funds from this program were utilized to fund nursing education and to help educate nurses who work in the rural or underserved areas. In addition, the funds provided loan forgiveness for clinical nurses and nursing educators in order to increase retention within the nursing field. The funds for this program are awarded from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The advanced nursing education grants have helped educate nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, nurse midwives, nurse anesthetists, nurse administrators, and public health nurses in primary care in unserved and rural areas.
There are currently an estimated 2.75 million registered nurses in the United States. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the nursing workforce is projected to increase by 15% between 2016 and 2026 in order to meet the needs of our baby-boomers that are living longer, increased emphasis on preventative care, and to address chronic conditions. Currently, nursing schools are turning away qualified applicants due to lack of faculty, clinical sites, classroom space, clinical instructors, and budget limitations according to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. In 2016 alone, nursing schools were forced to turn away 64,067 qualified applicants to nursing programs. A report issued by the Bureau of Health Professionals predicts by 2020, the percentage of unfilled nursing positions will increase by 29%.
The Fiscal Year 2018 Omnibus Appropriations bill was signed by the President and includes $249.472 million for Title VIII, which is close to a 9% increase over FY 2017. The bill also included $158 million for the National Institute of Nursing Research, which is a 5% increase over FY 2017. The breakdown of the Title VIII programs are listed. As nurses, we need to continue to speak Congress regarding the importance of these Title VIII funds. NANN will continue to provide updates on Title VIII Nursing Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2017 (HR 959/S.1109).
March 2018 - CHIP Renewed Through FY2023
Theresa Crowe, BSN CCRN
Last fall, the Health Policy and Advocacy Committee (HPAC) reported on the funding crisis facing the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). CHIP is a grant program in which the federal government and the states share the cost of extending health insurance coverage to children who neither qualify for Medicaid or whose parents don't have health insurance through their jobs. Information from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) indicates that about 9 million kids were covered by CHIP in fiscal year 2016.
Unfortunately, the federal side of CHIP's funding was set to expire this last September. Without that federal funding assistance, states would have been left to their own to either come up with the shortfall elsewhere in their budgets or to no longer offer coverage. Congress had been struggling over the budget, including whether or not to continue to fund CHIP. For these 9 million children and their families, they were facing the prospect of losing their health insurance and being unable to continue to afford much-needed medical care.
Congress provided some temporary stopgap measures to continue CHIP funding until March 2018, a time when it was believed that the final federal government budget plan would be finished. Professional organizations such as NANN, the March of Dimes, The Children's Hospital Association, and many others strongly supported the continuation of CHIP. In an example of successful advocacy, CHIP funding has been extended in the federal budget through FY2023. A few highlights of the new funding:
- Provides federal funding for CHIP for six years, from FY2018 through FY2023.
- Continues the 23 percentage point enhanced federal match rate for CHIP that was established by the Affordable Care Act, but reduces the federal match rate to the regular CHIP rate over time.
- Extends the requirement for states to maintain for coverage for children from 2019 through 2023; after October 1, 2019, the requirement is limited to children in families with incomes at or below 300% FPL.
Simmons-Duffin, Selena. After Months in Limbo for Children's Health Insurance, Huge Relief over Deal, National Public Radio: All Things Considered. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/01/23/580062690/after-months-in-limbo-for-childrens-health-insurance-huge-relief-over-deal. January 28, 2018.
Shapiro, Lisa. The Children's Health Insurance Program: Key Facts About CHIP and How it Helps Kids, First Focus. https://firstfocus.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CHIP-Key-Facts-082317-1.pdf. Sept. 2017.
Kaiser Family Foundation. Status of Federal Funding for CHIP and Implications for States and Families, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/fact-sheet/status-of-federal-funding-for-chip-and-implications-for-states-and-families/. January 10, 2018.
Scott, Dylan. Congress just funded CHIP for a full decade. Vox, https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/7/16986440/chip-funding-10-years. Updated Feb. 9, 1028.
November 2017 - Tax Reform Insight
Both chambers of Congress are actively working on comprehensive tax reform bills. The House of Representative's bill passed on Thursday, Nov. 16, while the Senate is readying for a floor vote immediately after the Thanksgiving holiday.
While neither the Senate's nor the House's legislation will be the final bill that reaches the President's desk, there are stark differences that exist between the two. The Senate's proposed bill includes the repeal of the individual mandate, a cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act. In the provision the repeal would not expire and is estimated to raise approximately $318 billion over 10 years.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has released an updated estimate in response to possible repeal of the individual mandate within the confines of the existing health care law. The number of uninsured will increase by 4 million in 2019 and 13 million by 2027. The CBO acknowledges the difficulty in projecting these numbers, but stated the following, "Despite the uncertainty, some effects of this policy are clear: For instance, the federal deficit would be many billions of dollars lower than under current law, and the number of uninsured people would be millions higher."
NANN is committed to advocating for affordable access to quality care for all. Under the existing health care law, removing the individual mandate at this time will have harmful effects on patient care. It is in the best interest of our patients and families for a fully vetted, scored, and debated health care legislation to be created.
The Senate is currently in recess and will reconvene on Monday, Nov. 27. Now is the time to make your voice heard – contact your Senators today!
As the tax reform bill continues to evolve, NANN will keep members abreast of new developments. If you have any questions, please contact Joe Lindahl, Sr. Operations Manager, at email@example.com.
September 2017 - Global Goal: Reducing Maternal Child Mortality
Julie Sundermeier, DNP APRN NNP-BC
Between 1990 and 2015, maternal mortality worldwide dropped by about 44%. While a significant improvement, every day approximately 830 women around the world continue to die from mostly preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth. During that same time period mortality rates for children under five were reduced by more than one half. Yet 16,000 children under the age of five continue to die daily. A 2015 United Nations report notes that 45% of all under-five deaths happen during the first 28 days of life, one million neonatal deaths occur on the day of birth, and close to two million children die in the first week of life.
A reintroduced piece of bipartisan legislation, the Reach Every Mother and Child Act of 2017 (S. 1730), has the goal to implement a strategic approach for providing foreign assistance in order to end preventable child and maternal deaths globally by 2030. This legislation would assist in the effort to end preventable deaths of mothers and children under five. The bill was introduced by Senators Susan Collins (R-ME), Chris Coons (D-DE), Johnny Isakson (R-GA), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Mike Enzi (R-WY), Chris Murphy (D-CT), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT). This bill will soon be introduced in the House of Representatives.
The Reach Every Mother and Child Act 2017 would:
- Establish rigorous reporting requirements to improve transparency, accountability, efficiency, and oversight of maternal and child health programs
- Coordinate a U.S. government strategy to end preventable maternal, newborn and child deaths and help ensure healthy lives by 2030
- Ensure that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) scales up the most effective programs
- Encourage the use of innovative ways to pay for these programs, including public-private partnerships
- Focus on the poorest and most vulnerable -populations, recognizing the unique needs of different countries and communities
- Improve coordination among the U.S. government agencies and relevant foreign governments and international organizations
- Accelerate partner country progress toward self-sustainability for maternal, newborn and child health
Contact your Senators to voice your support of reducing maternal child mortality at a global level.
UNICEF. Retrieved from http://www.childmortality.org
World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/
You D., et al. (2015). Global, regional, and national levels and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00120-8
July 2017 - Health Care Reform: What Now?
Elizabeth Welch-Carre, EdD MSN APRN NNP-BC
Last week was dramatic in the Senate as several bills that would change or repeal the Affordable Healthcare Act (AC) were introduced. Ultimately, the Senate could not pass any legislation that affects the current health care law in place.
On July 25th, by a vote of 51 to 50, the Senate passed a motion to begin debate to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA). All 48 Democrats and two Republican Senators opposed the motion. However, Vice-President Pence cast the tie-breaking vote allowing the debate to commence (Stark, 2017) and allowed what is called "vote-o-rama" to commence. During this time period all members of Congress were invited to propose new amendments to be voted upon before the bill is finalized.
The final bill was brought to the floor in the form of a "skinny bill" which would have
- Removed some of the ACA mandates
- Increase the number of uninsured to 43 million by 2026 (CBO, 2016)
- Increase premiums for non-group members by as much as 20% (CBO, 2016)
- Medicaid coverage for infants who need it
- No per capita cap because many infants may reach that cap early in life
- Continued coverage of essential health benefits:
- Ambulatory patient services
- Emergency Services
- Maternity and newborn care
- Mental health and substance use disorder treatment, including behavioral health
- Prescription drug coverage
- Lab services
- Preventative and wellness services and chronic disease management
- Pediatric services which include oral and vision care
- Continued coverage of pre-existing conditions because a) many infants have congenital conditions and b) many pregnant women/mothers have pre-existing conditions
The future of health care reform is unclear. The Senate GOP has stated that they wanted to change their focus to other legislation, most notably tax reform and infrastructure. However, both parties have maintained that they want to improve and stabilize the current health care market (Schroeder, 2017). President Trump is still encouraging the Republicans to find a replacement bill for the ACA. A bipartisan group of House members, called the Problem Solvers Caucus, are also gathering to discuss ways to improve the existing healthcare law.
NANN will continue to provide updates and advocate for the following:
Bryan, B. (2017, July 13). The Business Insider. Retrieved from Business Insider: http://www.businessinsider.com/ted-cruz-amendment-health-care-bill-preexisting-conditions-2017-7
Congressional Budget Office. (2016, December ). Congressional Budget Office. Retrieved from Congressional Budget Office: https://www.cbo.gov/budget-options/2016/52232
Congressional Budget Office. (2017, July 19). Cost estimate: H.R. 1628 Obamacare Repeal Reconciliation Act of 2017. Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/costestimate/52939-hr1628amendment.pdf
Krieg, G. (2017, June 26). CNN. Retrieved from CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/22/politics/comparing-obamacare-ahca-senate-health-care-bill/index.html
Ohlemacher, S., & Taylor, A. (2017, July 26). ABC News. Retrieved from ABC News: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/senate-health-care-debate-suspenseful-raucous-48853633
Ramsey, L. (2017, July 26). Business Insider. Retrieved from Business Insider: http://www.businessinsider.com/senate-health-care-vote-repeal-without-replace-2017-7
Schroeder, R. (2017, July 30). Market Watch. Retrieved from Market Watch: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/where-health-care-reform-goes-after-failure-to-repeal-and-replace-obamacare-2017-07-28
Stark, L. (2017, July 25). Vote tally: How each senator voted on GOP health care motion. Retrieved from CNN.com: http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/25/politics/vote-tally-senate-health-care/index.html
June 2017 - the ACHA and Maternal Child Health
Julie Sundermeier, DNP, APRN, NNP-BCChair, Health Policy and Advocacy Committee
H. R. 1628, the American Health Care Act (ACHA), has been in the spotlight with the House passing the bill by a narrow margin on May 4, 2017. This legislation would repeal and replace parts of the Affordable Care Act and has raised opposition from numerous notable medical organizations such as the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Nurses Association.
Among the concerns is the anticipated exponential increase in uninsured Americans. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a non-partisan office that provides independent analyses of budgetary and economic issues, published a report stating that there would reduction in the Federal deficit by $119 billion over the course of 2017 to 2026, and that "the largest savings would come from reductions in outlays for Medicaid and from the replacement of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) subsidies for nongroup health insurance". As a result, according to CBO's findings, 14 million more people would be uninsured in 2018, 19 million more in 2020, and an estimated 23 million more in 2026 compared to current law (Congressional Budget Office, May 24, 2017).
NANN is committed to advocating for maternal child health. The ACHA legislation passed by the House would have direct impact on the heath and welfare of the population we care for. Currently there are 37 million children that benefit from Medicaid and a record 95% of children across the United States currently have health coverage (Stein, 2017). The ACHA legislation passed by the House will have deleterious effects for maternal and child healthcare, impacting NICU patients and graduates directly.
H. R. 1628 (ACHA) as written would:
- Convert federal Medicaid financing to a per capita cap beginning in FY 2020. Federal share of payments would be capped with pre-set amount per enrollee (total or by population group)
- Preterm and sick infants could potentially reach their cap with a lengthy and involved initial hospital course.
- Babies who survive a premature birth and hospitalization may have lifelong health problems such as cerebral palsy, vision and hearing loss, and intellectual disabilities.
- Children born with congenital malformations and defects may require multiple surgeries and prolonged periods of hospitalization.
- Implementing a per capita cap could be difficult administratively and maintain current inequities across states (Rudowitz, 2016).
- Add state option to elect Medicaid block grant instead of per capita cap for certain populations for a period of 10 fiscal years, beginning in FY 2020. States would have a set amount of money for Medicaid spending
- Block grants could limit funding of important programs such as funding to public schools to provide early intervention services.
- Fewer individuals would qualify for Medicaid.
- In states electing Medicaid block grant, family planning would no longer be a mandatory covered service (Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation, 2017).
- Continue the ACA requirement to cover 10 essential health benefit (EHB) categories. All women and children benefit from the inclusion of these benefits.
- Ambulatory patient services
- Emergency Services
- Maternity and newborn care
- Mental health and substance use disorder treatment, including behavioral health treatment
- Prescription drugs
- Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
- Lab services
- Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management
- Pediatric services, including oral and vision care
However...starting in 2020, essential healthcare benefits, including maternity and newborn care, could be changed under state waiver authority (Kaiser, 2017). The CBO (2017) projects that "those living in states modifying the EHBs who used services or benefits no longer included in the EHBs would experience substantial increases in out-of-pocket spending on health care or would choose to forgo the services. Services or benefits likely to be excluded from the EHBs in some states include maternity care, mental health and substance abuse benefits, rehabilitative and habilitative services, and pediatric dental benefits. In particular, out-of-pocket spending on maternity care and mental health and substance abuse services could increase by thousands of dollars in a given year for the nongroup enrollees who would use those services." (CBO, March 13, 2017).
Weakening the rule of essential health care will allow insurers to charge people with pre-existing conditions higher premiums. It will also allow insurers to deny people coverage for the care and services they need. This could affect not only people in the individual market but also those who get their health insurance through employers.
Low maternal income or socioeconomic status is associated with preterm birth. If a mother cannot afford out of pocket expenses, prenatal care may be sporadic or deferred.
- Prohibit federal Medicaid payments to Planed Parenthood
- Federal law already prohibits federal dollars from being used to pay for abortions other than those to terminate pregnancies that are a result of rape, incest or a threat to the pregnant woman's life. (Ranji et al, 2017).
- Cutting off Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood for one year would result in loss of access to services, such as contraception) in some low-income communities. A CBO (March, 2017) report stated that the policy would result in thousands of additional unintended pregnancies that would in turn be financed by Medicaid.
The Senate is currently working on drafting their version of ACHA legislation. Details of this legislation have not been released to the public so little is known about how the Senate bill will compare to the House ACHA bill. NANN's HPAC Committee will monitor this legislation closely and update the NANN community once details are forthcoming. We encourage members to contact their representatives to educate them on how the ACHA will affect women and infants.
Congressional Budget Office. (May 24, 2017) Cost Estimate: H. R. 1628 American Healthcare Act of 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/costestimate/hr1628aspassed.pdf
Congressional Budget Office (CBO). (March 13th, 2017). American Health Care Act. Retrieved from: https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018/costestimate/americanhealthcareact.pdf
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (June 26, 2017). Summary of the American Health Care Act. Retrieved from: http://files.kff.org/attachment/Proposals-to-Replace-the-Affordable-Care-Act-Summary-of-the-American-Health-Care-Act
Ranji, U., Salganicoff, A., Sobel, L, & Rosenzweig, C. (May 8, 2017). Ten Ways That the House American Health Care Act Could Affect Women. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Retrieved from: http://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/ten-ways-that-the-house-american-health-care-act-could-affect-women/
May 2017 - Nurse in Washington Internship (NIWI) and NANN
Stephanie M. Blake DNP, RN, NNP-BC
Chair-Elect, Healthy Policy and Advocacy Committee
I had the pleasure of participating in the NIWI program through the NANN NIWI Scholarship Program, which is a gathering of nursing professionals covering all spectrums of healthcare, and a forum for The Nursing Community coalition. The coalition includes 63 national nursing organizations all of which are committed to improving the health and health care of our nation through collaboration by supporting the education and practice of Registered Nurses (RNs) and Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).
The three day internship was jam packed with all the information one needed to know on the how, when, what, and why of nursing advocacy. The first two days consisted of panels including Professional Nurse Advocates, a Congressional Staff Panel, and a General Advocacy Panel. In preparation for our day on the Hill, discussions included advocacy training and tips as well as the Nursing Community coalition "Asks". Representative Gail Adcock, MSN, RN, FNP-BC, FAANP, North Carolina House of Representatives and the first APRN elected to the North Carolina legislature, was the featured speaker, who was dynamic and inspiring. Her poignant discussion of her life in politics and work experiences as a Family Nurse Practitioner that led her to where she is today was as comical as it was serious. Listening to Rep.Adcock left all attendees feeling as if it is time to get up, make our voices heard, and advocate for change.
Day three was comprised of meetings on the Hill where these three "Asks" were given to each attendee's home state House Representative as well as Senate Representative.
Ask 1: $244 million for the Title VIII Nursing Workforce Development Programs in FY 2018.
In order to ensure access to care across the nation, investments in the pipeline of RNs and APRNs must remain a top priority. While great strides have been made to meet the demand for nurses, a constant focus must be placed on education to ensure a stable workforce. This could not be truer in communities struggling to recruit and retain highly qualified providers, including those in rural and medically-underserved regions.
For over 50 years, the Nursing Workforce Development Programs (Title VIII of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 296 et seq.]) have helped to meet the nation's demand for nurses. More than ever, safeguarding dollars to promote America's health through nursing care is critical. These dollars translate to on-the-ground care being delivered in all corners of the country. For example, in Academic Year 2014-
2015, the Title VIII Advanced Nursing Education Grants supported 9,024 graduate nursing students and partnered with over 4,200 clinical training sites. Of these, 45% were located in underserved areas and 46% provided primary care.
Update: Since our visit to the Hill, President Trump released his FY 2018 Budget Proposal which recommends to Congress steep cuts to HHS programs. The proposal suggests the Title VIII Nursing Workforce Development programs be decimated by 64% taking the funding level from $229.472 million in FY 2017 down to $82.977 million. To put this in context, this is slightly more than the programs received back in FY 2001. Essentially, what the budget recommends is to only fund the NURSE Corps (Loan Repayment and Scholarship program-*note 0.19% decrease from the Omnibus, not the CR as reported in the justification) and eliminates the funding for the following Title VIII programs:
- Advanced Nursing Education Grants (ANE), ANE Traineeships, and Nurse Anesthetist Traineeships
- Nurse Education, Practice, Quality, and Retention Program
- Nurse Faculty Loan Program
- Nursing Workforce Diversity Grant
- Comprehensive Geriatric Education Grants
Ask 2: $160 million for the National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) in FY 2018
As one of the 27 Institutes and Centers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), NINR funds research that establishes the scientific basis for quality patient care. Nurse scientists supported by NINR are advancing discoveries in genetic research, leading team science, and promoting precision health initiatives. In addition, nurse scientists lead complex studies focused on health promotion and disease prevention. The Ad Hoc Group for Medical Research is requesting at least $2 billion above the FY 2017 funding level for the National Institutes of Health, in addition to funds included in the 21st Century Cures Act. Included in this amount is $160 million for the National Institute of Nursing Research.
Update: As it relates to the NINR, President Trump's FY 2018 budget proposes taking the funding levels back to approximately what NINR received 16 years ago. The President recommends a 24% reduction to NINR— taking the funding from $150.273 million in FY 2017 down to $113.668 million. For all of NIH, the recommended cut is approximately 21% taking the funding from $32.084 billion to $26.9 billion. (Please note, the President's Budget compares the CR levels and not the final FY 2017 Omnibus).
Ask 3: Join the Nursing Caucus
The bipartisan House and Senate Nursing Caucuses educate legislators on issues impacting the profession and how nurses are transforming America's health.
NIWI is not only for the novice nurse wanting to learn about advocacy, but for the experienced advocacy nurse as well, offering continued opportunities to advocate for the nursing community that we are all a part of. NANN will have additional information on the 2018 NIWI Scholarship program available after the Annual Conference in October.
- Health Resources and Services Administration. (2016) Justification of estimates for appropriations committees. Retrieved from: https://www.hrsa.gov/about/budget/budgetjustification2017.pdf
For more information about the Nursing Community requests, contact Convener of the Nursing Community, Dr. Suzanne Miyamoto, at firstname.lastname@example.org
April 2017 - 3 Quick and Simple Advocacy Tools
Keeping track of legislation can be intimidating. Bills are constantly changing, elected official's priorities are ever-shifting, and schedules are rarely kept. Throw in the multiple layers of federal, state, and municipalities - knowing what is going on in the world of public policy and advocacy can be near impossible. As a starting point, The Health Policy and Advocacy Committee (HPAC) has three simple (and free!) tools to help you stay current on legislation.
By Lizz Welch-Carre, MS NNP-BC
Govtrack is a non-partisan one-stop shop to learn more about legislative bills. The website allows you to set up alerts so that you can receive updates about bills that are important to you (such as nursing or healthcare). You can also receive a customized email each week with all of the bills and resolutions that have been submitted over the last. If you provide your address, the website will give you the names of your Representative and Senators – it even provides information about their voting record. GovTrack also has links to all of the legislative committees for Congress. It lists the names of the chair and all of the members of the committee and tracks committee activity or any of the subcommittees.
By Tommie Farrell, BSN RNC
If you're interested in more local and state specific legislation, OpenStates.org may be the website for you. Open States is an open source website run by volunteers that allows you to connect to your legislators in all 50 states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico. The website also allows you to track active or pending state legislation, the progress of bills, and how your legislator is voting. Data on the website is extensive and reliable, all of which is shareable via Twitter and Facebook.
By Tara Boice
Resistbot is a new, free service that turns text messages into faxes and sends them to your elected officials. Unlike pre-written form letters, which are often ignored by Congress, Resistbot doesn't tell you what to say. Your own personal message as a constituent and nursing professional can be more effective in reaching your representative. By texting "resist" to 50409 and answering a few simple questions, you will be able to generate personalized fax messages to your senators. Over time, Resistbot allows users access to more features such as the ability to contact your U.S. Representative.
No worries- messages don't have to be polished essays. A couple of sentences from a real voter can be very impactful. Just text "resist" to 50409 and in five minutes you can send two letters to your Senator. It's really that easy! Follow Resistbot @botresist on Twitter
March 2017 - Withdrawl of the American Health Care Act
In the February issue of From the Hill to the NICU, we discussed the Republican administration's plan to "repeal and transition" the Affordable Care Act (also known as the ACA or Obamacare) and saw the transition plan in March. The GOP's bill, the American Health Care Act (also known as the AHCA or Trumpcare), was a moving target up until the day of the vote as House Speaker Paul Ryan tried to amend portions of the bill that would appease the Freedom Caucus, the most conservative wing of the Republican Party. The final version of the AHCA that was debated included the elimination of essential health care benefits—including prenatal and maternal health care.
NANN issued a call to action opposing the AHCA as the House of Representatives planned to vote on the bill on Friday, March 24th. After four hours of debate, the AHCA was withdrawn after party leadership realized it did not have enough votes to pass.
The withdrawal of the AHCA leaves the ACA intact as the Republicans turn their attention towards tax reform.
What does this mean for us?
The ACA, signed into law in 2010 and enacted in 2014, still stands as federal law. States such as Kansas and North Carolina will now look at Medicaid expansion, knowing the ACA will remain the health care law for the foreseeable future. There will be two governorships up in 2017 (VA and NJ) and 39 up in 2018 (36 states, three territories). Health care will be a hot topic for all elections.
The Health Policy and Advocacy Committee is committed to working with other nursing organizations to monitor the ongoing communications on Capitol Hill. As additional information becomes available on health care legislation and other issues relevant to neonatal care, NANN will keep its members abreast with pertinent and timely updates.
Elizabeth Welch-Carre, MS NNP-BC
The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act, also known as the ACA or Obamacare, will be repealed by the Republican Party who controls the legislative and now executive branch of the federal government. The repeal will be done through budget reconciliation, which will eliminate the employer and participant penalties associated with the act, effectively making the law non-existent. This process is also how the ACA was originally passed.
Repeal and Transition
The GOP changed their initial tagline of "repeal and replace" to "repeal and transition," to accurately communicate the timeline needed to alter the existing law. As of this writing, no ACA replacement plan has been introduced into Congress, but there have been several possible plans discussed which include the following:
- Medicaid may be changed to block grants for states which would provide enrollees with a set amount of money for coverage
- Provide subsidies for premium coverage, instead provide tax breaks
- Likely will repeal the individual mandate for coverage
- States will be allowed to keep ACA if desired
- Cover pre-existing conditions but may be in high-risk pool
- Continue with coverage for offspring up to age of 26
What does this mean for us?
NANN is committed to working with other nursing organizations to monitor the ongoing communications on the hill. As it pertains to neonatal nurses and the specific population we provide care for, the following topics are on the HPAC's radar:
- Pregnancy and newborn care
- Breastfeeding benefits
- Covers the cost of breast pumps
- Substance use disorder treatment
- Mental Health Services
- Treatment for behavioral health diagnosis
- Substance use disorder treatment
- Pre-existing condition coverage
- Continuous health insurance coverage provided for pregnant women
- Continuous coverage for other pre-existing conditions that may impact pregnancy
- Preventative care woman
- STD testing and treatment
- Tobacco screening and treatment
- Breast cancer screening
- Preventative care kids
- Developmental screening 0 to three years
- Well-baby appointments
As additional information becomes available on this ongoing issue, NANN will keep our members abreast of pertinent and timely information.
If you have any questions regarding the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act or the Health Policy and Advocacy Committee, please contact Joe Lindahl, NANN Senior Operations Manager, at email@example.com.